| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 |
Posted at 05:15 PM in Start up Marketing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted at 11:35 AM in Business Development | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
These guys do a great holiday video featuring their portfolio companies.
Posted at 02:39 PM in VC Blogs, VC Terms | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Kauffman Foundation Senior Fellow Paul Kedrosky walks through the various roads to early-stage capital in the video below, explaining which options are appropriate for which ventures and debunking several investment myths along the way. Paul is a great person to follow on Twitter.
Posted at 10:15 AM in Pursuing VC | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Here is a re-work of a previous piece for Inc. on the value of speaking to angry customers.
Posted at 10:03 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Great recognition for the GramercyOne and GoBook.
Posted at 09:17 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Mark Suster interviews Eric Ries, author of the New York Times Bestseller The Lean Startup. This episode is all about building businesses in the most efficient and effective way possible. This includes having a “business hypothesis,” knowing when to go after the money, and how to “Fail Fast” while continuing to build a better product.
Posted at 09:10 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
This is a great presentation on making a great presentation. It is particularly applicable to pitching people on ideas or businesses. Well worth the time.
Nancy Duarte's talk at TEDx East from Duarte Design on Vimeo.
Posted at 01:18 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Image via Wikipedia
Many a company reaches the awareness, at some point in its evolution, that greater opportunity is presented by changing or "pivoting" onto a different path or into an entirely different business. It is quite common for venture backed companies to do this. But successfully pivoting a business is by no means an easy thing to do. Having watched teams do it well, here are 5 characteristics of a pivot that works out well.
1. Superior Market Awareness
Pivots that work benefit from tremendous customer awareness. They are more evolutionary than revolutionary by nature. The pivoting company learned what customers don't want and do want from the previous iteration. Simply put, the pivoter is saying "we worked really hard to sell our previous solution, the customers didn't want it. What they want, and we really know they want, is what we are pivoting to create and sell."
Pivots that lack this kind of understanding fail more often than not. The pivot into something with new customers in a wholly different market is a recipe for disaster. It is a pivot too far.
2. Head Start on a Solution
Companies that pull off successful pivots are typically able to use existing component pieces, they can get quick, positive feedback on the new solution. And more importantly, they can get to market quicker which will generate sales and momentum behind the pivot. Waiting 6 months for a new product to effect a pivot can be suicidal for pivoting companies.
3. Money in the Bank
Image via Wikipedia
The CEO who decides to pivot only after exhausting all available funds is a knucklehead. The VC who lets him do this may be worse. If something isn't working and a pivot is being seriously considered, decisiveness is critical. A pivot once the money is gone will not allow the company to convince backers to get on board with the new direction. A pivot without money to execute the change is flawed and likely doomed to failure.
4. Management Conviction and Capability
The team has to be bought into the pivot completely. Yes, there may be some doubts but if the product, sales and marketing folks don't act with focused conviction - the pivot is undermined on a basic level. Everybody needs to be bought into the change and no hidden resistance is acceptable.
The sidebar to this the management has to be actually capable of succeeding at growing a business. I was involved with a company that pivoted a couple of times. The company's management couldn't execute against any particular approach so pivoting always appeared pretty desirable to them. It covered the previous failures in a blanket of past tense market focus.
The funny thing was every pivot for them was into a desirable market. But they couldn't execute well, so they just keep pivoting into new markets into which -- surprise -- they couldn't execute well enough to succeed. But, with one more pivot, they could blame the previous failure on the previous market.
5. Investor Support
The pivot point is the easiest and most tempting moment for an investor to depart or discontinue supporting a company. Investor support of the pivot might reasonably be sought first, ahead of other constituencies. If the investors are bought in, or at least, open minded to the pivot, management has a chance to re-energize financial support. If investors aren't bought in or, worse, greatly surprised by a pivot, it materially undermines any chance of success.
So, pivot if you must, but don't expect to be easy or problem free. In short term, a pivot will trade one set of issues for another set of issues. If your right about the pivot, however, your post pivot issues will become the higher quality problems of scaling and growth. If you're wrong about the pivot, try again if you can meet the criteria above.
Posted at 10:48 AM in Pivot | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Check out this Huffington Post piece on LivingSocial's Black Friday efforts. Huff Po
Posted at 02:53 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Some things can only be known in the fullness to time, for now, here's a view from PEHub and Jonathan Marino. Today, I can' t correct or dispute anything. So I won't, maybe later....
peHUB Wire--Monday, Nov. 21, 2011
INTRO:
No-Tech? Did Grotech whiff this June when it dumped a substantial portion of its LivingSocial stake? If you believe the New York Times, it seems very possible. Raising $200 million at a $5 billion valuation means LivingSocial won’t be dependent on its near-term capital to get public, and that it will have plenty of time to sit back and watch and learn from its biggest competitor’s (many) missteps. Now, they’ll also be able to pinpoint the precise moment—should it happen—when DC-area-based LivingSocial’s valuation outstrips that of Groupon. According to one TechCrunch report, Grotech’s valuation has nearly doubled inside of the last seven months. Translation: it’s a good thing Don Rainey and the gang held onto the remainder of that LivingSocial stake. Now, when Grotech is out raising its next fund, it can say it only botched their market timing on exiting about half its best investment ever, instead of the whole thing. Fortunately, for as long as Danny Snyder runs the Redskins, every other investor around the Beltway will comparatively seem like a genius.
-Jonathan Marino
Posted at 10:08 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted at 03:58 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Paul Sherman and the Potomac Techwire folks always put on a first rate event. This is supported by their events frequently selling out. Here is a link to an upcoming event that I will be joining the panel for on December 15th. Should be fun and interesting as always given this crew.
Here is PTW's write up:
Venture Capital Outlook 2012 is part of the Potomac Tech Wire breakfast series that brings together senior executives in the Mid-Atlantic to discuss technology issues in a conversational, roundtable environment moderated by the editor of Potomac Tech Wire. The panel will focus on the overall outlook for venture capital investing in the DC area, current deal terms, technology trends, valuation issues and predictions.
Speakers:
John Backus, Founder and Managing Partner, New Atlantic Ventures
Arun Gupta, Partner, Columbia Capital
Don Rainey, General Partner, Grotech Ventures
Harry Weller, General Partner, NEA
Moderator: Paul Sherman, Editor, Potomac Tech Wire
Schedule:
7:30-8:00: Registration/Networking/Breakfast buffet
8:05-9:30: Panel Discussion and Breakfast
9:30-10:00: Networking
Twitter hash tag: #VCLook
Here is the link to register.
Posted at 01:36 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
The private sharing of private information is an idea whose time has come. And, so has the ability to automatically complete forms. Here is an introductory video.
Posted at 10:00 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted at 01:06 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted at 09:03 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Steve Case provides consistent and quality leadership to our community and StartUp America. Here is a short video link worth viewing.
Posted at 04:37 PM in AOL, Start up CEO, Start ups | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted at 04:38 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Image by elycefeliz via Flickr
The reasons to start a business are many and varied. In my experience, the CEO's that pitch us have one of three goals; they want to win or they want to make a lot of money or they want to change the world. So which CEO's tend to deliver the greatest returns?
Maybe not who you'd think.
Changing the world is consistently the best way to create value.
People whose aim is to win tend, over time, to reduce the scope of the game to one that is winnable. So rather than ambitions being large or goals getting bigger in impact as it progresses, this CEO's enterprise tends to narrow or shrink. And winning is often benefits a smaller and smaller group of people in this scenario. (Even if that means not winning for the investors) Winning is more important than the people so throwing some over board hardly matters.
A primary aim of making a lot of money introduces a whole gamut of decision influencers. Most of those influencers promote short cuts and borderline decisions. Yes, making money is the central point of an enterprise in a capitalist system. But trying to do so without creating value is akin to running a scheme.
People who seek to change the world create the greatest value. Value for themselves, employees, customer and investors. It is isn't about limiting the scope to "win" or taking short cuts to a great payday. It is about changing the world -- which is the biggest scope and doesn't support any short cuts. And changing the world requires a big idea that is well executed whereas winning or making a ton of money don't always require those in practice.
So you might ask, what about VC's? Do they want to make a ton of money, win or change the world?
Yes. Yes, they do.
Posted at 01:18 PM in Pursuing VC | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Here is the job listing that we will be promoting beginning next week to fill a new position. If you or someone you know has an interest, please note the email address at the bottom of this post.
Grotech Ventures, a leading, national venture capital firm headquartered in Tysons Corner, Virginia near Washington, D.C., is seeking an Associate to join our highly successful investment team. The Associate will be expected to hit the ground running, taking a proactive role in deal flow creation through networking and actively participating in venture/startup related events; conducting pre-investment due diligence, financial modeling and deal structural analysis; researching new potential investment areas and companies; and ultimately helping execute and manage the firm’s investments. The Associate will have the opportunity to get involved in every aspect of the investment process from sourcing to executing transactions to portfolio management.
Candidates should have prior experience in investment banking, venture capital, private equity, management consulting, or a broad-based role at a technology company or startup. The Associate position requires strong analytical capabilities, financial modeling proficiency and excellent written and oral communication skills.
Compensation commensurate with experience. Resumes should be sent to Jennifer Ports, jports@grotech.com.
Posted at 03:12 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Really appreciate the cover recognition by Modern DC Business and the way the article turned out. Thanks to all the folks at MDB.

Here is a link to the article.
Posted at 05:17 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted at 11:34 AM in LivingSocial, Pursuing VC | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Image via Wikipedia
Both LivingSocial and Groupon took the big leap and made the big investment into Super Bowl television advertising over the past weekend.
Image via CrunchBase
Given the multi-million dollar table stakes, this wasn't a small decision for either company. And with the massive audience watching the ads, it was a significant moment in each company's history and brand development. And, ultimately, both companies succeeded at communication and definition of their company brands with their advertisments. I suspect a broad swath of America has much better understanding of LivingSocial and Groupon and their respective values today.
In fact, both LivingSocial and Groupon took some risks with the ads. I won't speak to the content of these ads but it does strike that they are emblematic of the need for entrepreneurs to continually take risks. Even, or especially, when the stakes are highest. Which isn't any different than when starting out a company. It is worth noting, that it never gets easier for the entrepreneur as the stakes get larger. But it does get more rewarding when it works out. Which is another way of saying that it never gets boring and that is one of the reasons why the entrepreneurial experience is always an adventure. Kudos to both management teams to putting themselves out there.
LivingSocial's Ad
Groupon's Lead Ad
Image via Wikipedia
Posted at 12:13 PM in LivingSocial | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Image by Getty Images via @daylife
Amateurs talk strategy; the professionals focus on tactics; and superstars concentrate on culture.
Superstars focus on culture because a company’s culture will determine if the company will successfully execute its strategy and tactics. A company’s culture is a statement of its values that influences all actions and every decision associated with the execution of strategies and tactics.
Company culture isn’t group think as much as it is identification of valued behaviors and common beliefs. This identification is informative to every employee -- every day. Many successful business people believe that culture is the basis of everything their employees do.
The recent success of Zappos is a result of the company being defined by its culture and succeeding on the basis of that culture. Tony Hsieh, CEO of Zappos, is famous for stating that “if you get the culture right, most of the other stuff — like great customer service, or building a great long-term brand, or passionate employees and customers — will happen naturally on its own.”
Image via Wikipedia
Tony clearly believes in a “culture first” approach.
For everyone else who intends to start a business from scratch and succeed, you need to have a handle on culture creation and culture support. If you create the right culture, it can enable you to succeed even when strategies flail and tactics fail. Culture will enable employees to do the right thing.
How do you do this? Define your values clearly, realize that little things can mean a lot, and always reinforce your words with actions.
Define your cultural values and live them
What do you value? What behaviors does your company reward? Would you like employees to help customers or “surprise and delight” them? Is it desirable for employees to work well together and “recognize others”? Defining cultural values is to specifically describe the behavior and/or goals of the organization within a context of broad principles.
Since your cultural values must be useful to employees, they must also be definitive terms. Company values shouldn’t be solely aspirational. Don’t suggest that employees “strive” to do something. Everyone has a different definition of striving for that matter. Your values must be results oriented to be useful.Think “make,” “achieve,” and “deliver” rather than “demonstrate,” “show,” or “lead.” Employees want to do the right thing but in many instances aren’t sure what that right thing is given the circumstances.
Once you have defined your organization’s cultural values; you have created a framework that informs all employees. Your declared company values provide insight during those oh-so-frequent moments when an employee is faced with an unanticipated situation. I recently responded to a Facebook ad that promised a $50 instant credit for a first purchase at Bonobos. I bought a pair of pants and due largely to a credit card snafu was credited twice for the $50. I called Bonobos to rectify the double credit and the customer representative said “Hey, we can’t fix that in our systems, thank you so much for calling, you need to consider the extra $50 a bonus.” (Shout out to Bonobos Ninja, Tim MacGougan ) What?? I suspect that Bonobos informs it employees to “delight” customers rather than “satisfy” them. That cultural bias will win you customers for life as Bonobos did here with me.
Honor employees very publicly and demonstrate when they have values
If you want employees to champion the values; make a point to publicly and materially reward those employees that exhibit the company’s values in their actions. This will benefit all employees. Google is famous for providing six figure bonuses to team members responsible for major innovations. If you value innovation within your culture, reward it generously to foster the desired behavior. If you value delighting customers, reward that behavior when you see it. Positive reinforcement is a strong motivator. Put your money and your recognition behind your values.
Little things mean a lot
mazon uses old doors on sawhorses for desks. It is one thing to say we are a frugal company with a “no frills” work environment and it is another to use old doors for desktops. Amazon doesn’t need to tell employees working from old doors that they should be on the lookout for opportunities to save money. If they don’t see it on the desk in front of them, they won’t get it from any other form of communication.
Honor the culture you create in all you do, big things and small. Don’t allow the culture to push back at any of the fringes with exceptions. Understand that there will be continual resistance to doing certain things in certain ways. Or, in spite of a commitment to give back to the community, that there is a legitimate economic gain for the company NOT giving employees four hours a month to volunteer locally. Cheap hotels are often not as nice as pricier ones and the potential rationales to upgrade will be many and varied. Maintain consistency by being inflexible on the values application to all decisions.
Actions must continually reinforce words
As a leader, you must exemplify the culture and its values. If you punish failure with disapproval, you diminish risk taking. People seek approval and if you aren’t ready to continually recognize people for acting appropriately related to your cultural norms, you aren’t building the culture. In fact, you either support or diminish the culture with each every hiring decision.
You should be careful to hire people that fit within your culture. Zappos is famous for its $2,000 “quit bonus” to new employees. The quit bonus is offered to employees who are completing week one of a four week training program and stands until the end of the fourth week. If an employee isn’t interested in the company or more than a paycheck, they can take the quitting bonus and leave the company. In fact, 1% take the quit bonus. The other 99% want to be there and are committed to the company. As a recult, Zappos doesn’t have an issue of hiring employees who don’t support the company culture.
Ultimately, your company’s culture will influence every element of strategy and every tactic executed by the team on a daily basis. Without a supporting culture, strategy and tactics are somewhat meaningless. Culture doesn’t self define, however, and needs direction attention. Successful business owners envision their company culture from the start. They believe that culture super cedes strategy and tactics. Go ahead and define your organizations’ culture, then follow with strategy and end with tactics… by doing so you can be assured of reasonable execution and informed employees.
Originally published on BusinessInsider on 12-15-10.
Posted at 08:47 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted at 09:37 AM in LivingSocial | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
As a former entrepreneur, now on the “dark side” of Venture Capital for the last ten years; here are 10 lessons I got from the investment side of that experience . These lessons still serve me well on a daily basis.
1. Price doesn’t really matter
Image via Wikipedia
If a deal works out, the price was right at some level. Get in good deals, and forget about getting the last dollar in a negotiation for that good deal. If the venture fails, whatever you paid was too much. Yes, in the event of success, you would have made more if you paid less… but that is always true of successful investments.
2. Management is everything
Great management will make the right pivots at the right time. The talent, drive and vision of the management team will determine success or failure. If you’re looking at a great idea, if it’s paired with poor management…run.
3. Never pursue a small idea
It is no safer, no easier and much less rewarding to pursue a small idea rather than a big idea.. What’s the point in trying to change the neighborhood when you can change the world. Small ideas struggle to find their way, so do larger ones, so you might as well be working on the large idea. Small ideas are never worth the trouble.
4. You are not a rock star and never will be one as an investor
The entrepreneurs are the stars and they always will be the stars. If you want to be a star go be an entrepreneur. If you’re an investor, work to make your entrepreneur a rock star. Enable their success and enlist recognition for them and what they’re doing.
5. If you don’t add value outside of board meetings, you’re not adding value
The board meeting is a stilted environment for contribution. If you can’t establish yourself as a worthy advisor outside the board meeting, you’re likely not one in it.
6. Don’t invest in people who ignore good advice
Some people have a world class talent for ignoring good advice. Many of them end up as self employed entrepreneurs . Those kinds of entrepreneurs are not worth investing in. Great people and great business people are more open to alternate points of view. Invest in bright people who don’t or won’t ignore good advice.
7. Try to win in the long term….not the short term
If you strike deals which over time prove unfavorable to the other side, your opponents (and they will view themselves as such) will be motivated to screw you. And they will usually succeed at doing so. Strike agreements that are good now and still fair later.
8. Never panic
There are few things uglier than a scared venture capitalist. Don’t ever be anxious to the point that anyone notices. Sometimes slow and steady wins the race. Not many good decisions are made based on fear, especially business decisions.
9. Be nice to people; it pays well
Image via Wikipedia
Most of the better deal flow comes from people who like me better than my venture capital competitors. Why me and not them? I strive to treat everyone with respect. (I’m sure it’s that and not my jokes…) Be nice to people. It pays off every day.
10. Great deals tend to be great already
In ten years in the VC business, other VC’s haven’t really ever asked me to look at anything other than their dog deals. The great deals are out there but you are going to have to find them yourself. The good news is that they are great deals already. The challenge is to recognize that.
When I started in Venture Capital, my firm directed me to create “proprietary deal flow” which was a term that I didn’t initially comprehend the meaning of. Proprietary deal flow refers to development of a deal pipeline that contains opportunities not seen by others. Today, ten years on, I have pretty good proprietary deal flow. To create that proprietary deal flow, I needed to internalize the 10 lessons listed here -- which might be summarized as be fair, be a good person and look for good people to back.
This article was originally published on BusinessInsider.com
Posted at 09:06 AM in Pursuing VC, VC Terms | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Image via CrunchBase
Paul Sherman and the folks at Potomac Tech Wire always do a great job executing these events. They typically sell out so if you have any interest best to buy a ticket sooner than later.
I will be one of the panelists and the others will be:
Phil Bronner, General Partner, Novak Biddle Venture Partners
Thanasis Delistathis, Managing Partner, New Atlantic Ventures
Tige Savage, Managing Director & EVP, Revolution LLC
Harry Weller, General Partner, NEA
Image via CrunchBase
Here is a link to the event overview.
And a registration page.
Posted at 09:13 AM in Pursuing VC, VC Blogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
These non-obvious people tend to be the people in your work life who march to a different drummer. Sometimes quirky or just a little different, these folks distinguish themselves via insight or work ethic or activity. You may enjoy their company and appreciate interacting with them without fully appreciating how valuable these folks can be to your career.
These “different drummer” folks, including nut jobs, hustlers, self-promoters and geniuses, may not be your “go to” people in your work life. But if you want to rise as a star, you need a diverse network of “go to” people around you, and these folks can be especially valuable.
Success is facilitated by a network of friends and associates that provide with unique insights and timely support. If you have people in your network that see things others don’t, you will be enabled to jump a step ahead ( or stay there). You may not naturally gravitate to reliance with these types of folks, but strong relationships with them will serve you well. You will need to create ties to them, but first, you need to recognize them. Here are four unusual friends:
1. The Nut Jobs
Image by Stephen Dyrgas via Flickr
2. The Hustlers
Hustlers work relentlessly harder than their peers. They tend to get promoted. Shock of all shocks, people who work harder tend to promoted above all others. If you want to be promoted consistently, you are going to work pretty hard too. Hustlers are easy to identify – literally, because they will be the ones starting early and staying late; and figuratively, because their contributions (and hopefully yours) are the ones that stand out.
Hustlers talk to more people.They do more. They hear more and know more than almost anyone in the environment. They are usually adept at predicting what initiatives will fly and which will fail, whose stock is on the rise and the changing of management focus.
3. The Self-Promoters
Cover of Smart People
Look, you may or may not be adept at self promotion. Either way, you need to identify and cultivate relationships with the great self promoters in your sphere of influence. Self-Promoters are an accurate barometer of the current view of success; and they provide the conventional view of any situation. The self promoter has a valuable skill set and needs a message that sells; while you may need those skills and have a message that needs to be sold.
While you can argue that self promoters are attempting to influence and direct the real time perspective of success and thus their value as a barometer is undermined, it is unrealistic to ignore their innate sensitivity to promoting things that people accept. Get to know a self-promoter and you will get to know the conventional wisdom in your arena.
4. The Geniuses
No matter how bright you are, you will encounter people who are a great deal more intelligent than you. You need to build a cadre of exceptionally smart people who can help you tackle your vexing dilemmas. The true geniuses that you encounter are unlikely to identify themselves. Most people aren’t observant
Image via Wikipedia
Befriend, align yourself and otherwise connect with Nut jobs, Hustlers, Self-promoters and Geniuses to fuel and support your career. They each offer a value far greater than the time invested in the relationship. And you may find yourself with unexpected friends.
Originally published on BusinessInsider.com on 11.17.10
Posted at 04:06 PM in Start ups | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Image via CrunchBase
Can you get better at spotting the most promising opportunities? How do you recognize the next big thing? How does anyone know it when they see it ?
If you’re like most people, throughout your life a few great opportunities will land on your doorstep. And again, if you’re like most people, you’ll ignore these rare opportunities because you won’t recognize them as great chances for success.
Don’t feel bad; even people in the opportunity recognition business – including prominent venture capitalists – miss out on great opportunities. Bessemer Venture Partners has an “Anti-Portfolio” on its website of prominent successful companies that they chose not to invest in.
Bessemer is a long time, successful venture capital firm which passed on Apple, Google, Federal Express (multiple times), Intel, and Paypal. Everybody misses a few, no one gets them all. The Bessemer Venture Partner firm approaches these missed opportunities with maturity and grace (probably at least in part because missing isn’t their predominant pattern). They have a lot of hits in their history, more hits than misses overall, which is the foundation of their success.
Image via Wikipedia
We all build success from our realized opportunities. And we all strive for more hits than misses. If you can do better than average at recognizing the opportunities in your life, you might truly prosper. But how does one build opportunity recognition ability?
I argue that internalizing four concepts about the nature of opportunity can markedly improve your recognition skills. These four concepts are:
1. It won’t be perfect
The ideas that will develop into great opportunities tend to be fully thought out when you hear them. But they aren’t perfect. Not at the beginning, in the middle or at the end. Your ability to see the imperfection shouldn’t blind you to the larger possibilities. In my venture capital firm, when we hire new,(typically younger people), into the business, we are accustomed to the newcomers hating every deal. They are smart enough to see the imperfection but not yet experienced enough to be confident accepting that the imperfection doesn’t define the opportunity. Endeavor to see the opportunity in spite of the imperfection of the current presentation.
Does it sound like it could be a big idea? If no, don’t bother looking any further. But if the answer is yes, accept the reality that there will be obstacles between the current moment and achievement of the imagined goal.
Regardless of the obstacles and imperfections, great opportunities are usually well thought out. Which is to say, that someone or a team of someones is thinking through every aspect of realizing the opportunity. They may not have all the answers for every challenge that must be met, but they are thinking about everything.
2. The future is built with today’s tools not tomorrow’s tools
The great innovations of tomorrow are usually built with today’s technologies in new combinations. You would be mistaken if you think true “invention” is the source of innovation or the typical great opportunity.
Many people seek a technological breakthrough or outright marvel as proof of the existence of opportunity. (And sure, sometimes break troughs and marvels are proof of opportunity), but many great opportunities are not driven by a breakthrough as much as a re-packaging or a better combination of advances. Apple’s iPhone is the migration of a friendly operating system onto a smart phone and the Apple iPod series is built from broadly available components.
For that matter, don’t focus your evaluation of an opportunity on what’s missing like the big technology step forward or novel process. Look at what is present today. Because the big breakthrough is rare, and you must focus on what’s present.
3. Appreciate the evolution of previous failures
Failed attempts at an idea are more a testament to the value of the idea rather than a repudiation. In fact, most great opportunities aren’t realized on the first attempt of an idea’s execution but rather as the perfected evolution of previous failures.
When Youtube.com got going in the summer of 2005, it had no less than 30 comparable competitors. Failures in the video sharing website genre go back to ZoomCulture.com in the fall of 1999. YouTube perfected their formula by making videos easy to upload and discover; but more importantly, by allowing other websites to embed the videos, Youtube broke through to widespread distribution. And with wider distribution, Youtube became the winner.
eBay was one of dozens of online auction sites with comparable functionality in the late 1990’s but yet it was eBay who emerged to lead a massive new category. eBay succeeded by solving the initial buyer trust issue with a feedback system. That feedback system enabled eBay to succeed as the online auction leader over auction sites with arguably better technology. They perfected the model.
In order to fairly assess an opportunity, you must examine the causes of preceding failures.Early video websites failed, in large part, because people had limited bandwidth. If the underlying cause of failure isn’t applicable any longer, the idea may be poised to succeed.
4. Timing can be everything
The single most powerful question you must ask yourself about an opportunity related to timing. Is right now the right time for this idea? There are a lot of great ideas that don’t become great opportunities until the time is right for them.
Interacting socially online with people of common interests or social circles has succeeded repetitively. The current social networks are simply the most successful. The current social networks reached a point of critical mass, for example, when there was nearly ubiquitous Internet access AND widespread personal usage of the Internet. If most of your friends aren’t online frequently, a social network is of limited utility.
Facebook wasn’t the first social network and neither was MySpace. I invested in an online site for a teen audience to create their own online space with email, music and status sharing in 1996. It was called Myroom.com and…. it wasn’t the right time. The idea of a social network can probably trace itself back to the original computer bulletin boards. A major factor for Facebook success was the timing.
You will find analogous failures for every opportunity you ever consider deeply. If you can’t comprehend why they failed, you will be ill equipped to evaluate the modern day equivalent. But the truth is, thanks to accessibility of people and their stories, you usually can find something, somewhere wherein the founders detail those causes.
In my thirty year career, I have encountered five great opportunities and recognized three of them. In your career, in order to do better on the final accounting of opportunities vs. recognition; you must first recognize the opportunities … and they don’t always show up gift wrapped. Taking these truths into account, you should have an improved ability to know ‘em when you see ‘em.
Originally published 11.19.10 on BusinessInsider.com
Posted at 10:50 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
But it's really the questions you ask that can make or break your candidacy.
Image via Wikipedia
At appropriate intervals during an interview, you should ask questions that communicate your interest in the position, highlight your capabilities and demonstrate your commitment to excelling in your career.
Remember, since you’re competing (either with other candidates or against yourself), by asking questions you are expanding your competitive palette from just answers to your answers and your questions.
Tackle the interviewer’s doubts by first discovering them and then addressing them. Some will be legitimate shortcomings but most will be misunderstandings.
Either way, you should take your best shot at diffusing the interviewer’s concerns.
Alternatively, the interviewer may respond that they have no doubt about your ability to handle the job. And if they think this, you benefit from the interviewer stating it aloud. It helps strengthen their belief.
O.K., it’s a totally loaded question, but it is effective at getting the interviewer to think about your fit with the company. It also sets up a statement about how that fit should weigh favorably in the decision to hire you.
More employees get let go for not fitting into the work culture than for any other reason. You should never fail to ask this question if you’re being interviewed by a potential boss.
Image via Wikipedia
Or you may be able to dispel the perceived superiority of the “lead candidate.” Then again, you could be the lead candidate. And if you are the lead candidate, the next question is critical...
You may get a response such as “we have other people to see.” To which you may respond, “Of course, I have some other interviews as well, but I wanted you to know that I would like this job.”
Look, you should ask for every job you ever interview for. Not necessarily because you want the job but you should never leave an interview completely uncertain of where you stand in the candidate ranking.
Asking for the job will provide you information about how you stack up against the competition and where the company is in the hiring process.
Posted at 02:38 PM in Start up Marketing, Start ups | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Image by asvensson via Flickr
For an entrepreneur, the truth related to opportunity, market, product, and customers is a constant pursuit. The truth, however, is fungible. Things change and if you want to succeed as an entrepreneur, you need to match the moments of truth with appropriate change. Discovering the truth about your business, or your customers or your marketplace is one side of the issue. The other side of the issue is avoiding false beliefs.
So, where will you encounter mistruths? Fom people who provide false statements, beliefs or assumptions in the form of opinions or advice. It is a fact of life that people will mislead you on occasion. Some people will intentionally mislead you, and others will inadvertently mislead you. Some people will do it all the time and others will do it only sometimes. Either way, a person’s intention is irrelevant if you are ultimately misled or make decisions based on faulty information.
If you want to do well with your business, you’ve got to be superior at spotting nonsense and recognizing crap when you hear it. Strive to develop a well-honed B.S. meter. Without one, you waste time and squander opportunities. With one, you avoid time wasting tangents, useless fire drills and other time sinks.
If want to enhance your B.S. spotting skills, you should do the following six things.
Determine the speaker's self interest
Whenever someone is presenting a point of view, you owe it to yourself to consider how their opinion might correlate to their own self-interest. After all, there must be some reason they have to make the argument to you in the first place. And that reason more likely correlates with their own self-interest than with yours.
So make sure the speaker’s self-interest does not skew their point of view. If it does, at least be cognizant of it so you can value the opinion appropriately. Of course, in some situations a person’s motivation for their position may increase the validity of their opinion. But take a step back and make sure you know where the speaker is “coming from” before you act based on their presentation.
Question the data
Cover of Telling The Truth
We live in a world of pseudo science, skewed sample sets and anonymous experts. Don’t accept anything as an important truth without first examining the source. The magic of PowerPoint is, in part, its ability to build charts without underlying data.
The competitive comparison slide, either in a feature check box or X-Y positioning graph style, is frequently created to maximize the slide creators’ position without a scintilla of independent support. Make sure data is cited and the source valid before you incorporate the data as part of your truths.
Watch for truth qualifying statements
“To tell you the truth” or “Let’s be frank” or “I have to be honest…” are all statements that beg the question – “Are we starting to be honest just now?” Anybody who makes repetitive pointed declarations about telling the truth is selling something to you.
Be aware of speaker-initiated “truth moments.” Rely on your innate sense of whether someone is speaking candidly. These conversational clichés can alert you to possible (o.k….probable) mistruths or fuzzy facts.
If someone immediately or continually drops the name(s) of high profile people, it is worthy of suspicion.
Credibility should always be derived from the strength of the argument, known facts and/or the reputation of the person present. If absent prominent people are the backbone of an argument, you should be suspect.
Once you offer a good counter argument, people who are misleading you intentionally may exhibit complete confusion. It is often an effective response. The counterpoint, while obvious and logical to you is too contradictory or nonsensical to the bullshiter to be comprehensible.
“What, you say?” is the response or something that boomerangs your thought without reacting to its merit. This type of response is meant to undermine your confidence in the soundness of your counter argument without seeking to specifically or factually oppose the point itself. Watch out for confusion when there should be none.
If a conversation provides you with one obvious thought after another, wait for the end of the train of thoughts as it is typically an illogical conclusion. After getting into a “ yes…yes… yes…” rhythm, you may easily accept a well placed random conclusion or mistruth. Based upon preceding agreement with the speaker, you might find it natural to agree to something illogical or nonsensical. And agreeing to a point of view is the first step in adopting a point of view. Examine your speaker’s logic before accepting it.
Successful people vary greatly in style and approach but they commonly share an extraordinary ability to discern the truth. If you want to do well, develop a great B.S. meter, it will serve you every day.
This article was originally published on 11/11/10 on BusinessInsider.com's WARROOM.
Posted at 11:09 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
I started my business career with the naïve assumption that if I worked hard, kept my head down and contributed well as a team player, I would get noticed and promoted by upper management. You can imagine my shock when I realized that some of my peers chose means other than hard work and valid contribution to pursue recognition and promotion. These folks, ( let’s call them rat bastards), sought advancement via self-promotion, empire building, bandwagon jumping and good old fashioned back-stabbing. What I didn’t originally anticipate was how many rat bastards ( which is ultimately a term of affection) I would encounter along the way. I also underestimated their effectiveness. Nor did I have any tactics to handle them.
By the time I became a CEO, I was able to identify and remove rat bastards or at least shut down their activities. If you’re lucky enough to work in a company where political behavior is frowned upon, the culture will probably declaw these folks. If you’re not, you need to learn to cope with these folks and their maneuvers.
Now, a little self promotion or well-timed politicking may sometimes be a powerful additive to your work efforts. But if self promotion doesn’t come naturally to you, you need to counterbalance the rat bastards without sacrificing your integrity or becoming one of them.
So here is a quick view of some of the rat bastards (“R.B.’s”) and how to handle them. These are some practical yet relatively innocent counter-measures for some typical rat bastard behavior.
The Self Promoting R.B.
Who they are:
Barnum the Rat Bastard is adept at using all media and messaging available to amplify his or her successes, contributions and achievements. The level of achievement or degree of difficulty associated with any success isn’t a primary concern. The primary objective is the communication to a targeted audience for the purpose of inflating perceived value of the self promoting R.B. While you may be toiling away and hoping for mere recognition of meeting significant milestones, this isn’t part of the paradigm of the self promoter. The self promoting R.B. promotes often, loudly and without discernment.
How to deal with them:
As a practical matter, you can’t say or do anything contrary to R.B.’s self promoting messaging regardless of how overblown it is. Instead, you need to re-amplify the message as much as possible. If the self promoter sends out an email trumpeting a personal/organizational achievement, embellish the claims and expand the distribution by forwarding the email to a broader list. Don’t re-amplify every message mind you, but only those messages that are the most transparently self promotional. Yes, there is some downside risk in re-amplification but the upside is that the self promoting R.B.’s credibility typically suffers because anyone broadly understood to be a self promoter ends up with a credibility issue.
The Empire Building R.B.
Who they are:
Julius Rat Bastard, the grabber of headcount, budget and all manner of territory for means and to ends unclear even to himself. For this R.B., the only point that matters is building the kingdom. This R.B. operates with the presumption that more resources equates with more value and importance. There isn’t an evaluation on Julius’ part about making the sum greater than the total of the parts; Julius is just focused on making the sum as big as possible by acquiring more parts.
How to deal with them:
To slow Julius R.B. down in the long term, you need to be “helpful” in the short term. First, take all your marginal performers, known troublemakers and general pains-in-the-neck and get them into a single functional group. Then, task that group with something that either appears to or does overlap responsibilities with a group working within Julius’ organizational functions. This will prompt an irresistible temptation for Julius to petition upper management for the transfer of your troublemaker group into his domain. When the discussion inevitably arises, you agree to the transfer of this function and it’s associated group to Julius R.B. In one move you have reduced your management headaches while transferring them to a place where they can do you some good; and you appear to be a great team player. That can be the end of it. (On the other hand, you may choose to comment on how poorly the group is faring after the move and state that you never had any issues with the team. But that would be perilously close to rat bastard behavior.)
The Bandwagon Jumping R.B.
Who they are:
Like a newly converted 2010 Miami Heat fan, this R.B. will align himself with any obvious winner. Using revisionist history and creative story line gerrymandering, this R.B. can trace his role and contribution into every organization success. In order for him to do this, the Bandwagon jumping R.B. has to constantly monitor people’s perspectives on the status of many initiatives. In order to jump on the right bandwagon at the right time, he must always seek association with potential successful bandwagons.
Image via Wikipedia
How to deal with them:
Your mission is to simply tout the likelihood of successful outcomes for every initiative you’re aware of. Occupy the bandwagon jumping R.B.’s time by recommending initiatives and projects. Help this R.B. claim involvement or create tenuous relationships with many looming victories. The farther afield geographically, organizationally, or functionally the better, as the gravitational pull of any bandwagon is powerful to this rat bastard. And since there won’t be much intellectual honesty about the association or involvement, you can leverage the pull of many bandwagons across a broad array of activities.
The Back Stabbing R.B.
Who they are:
Richard Hatch of the original “Survivor” TV show comes to mind. Sure, you may not know who they are as you won’t hear their musings, statements and mistruths until after they’ve back-stabbed. In my experience most back stabbers are the toughest R.B.s to spot. Some will be your “friend”, most won’t bother with the charade. These are R.B.s who operate in the shadows, making private derogatory comments and accusations that can torpedo your credibility and success.
How to deal with them:
The only proactive method for dealing with these R.B.s is to spot them before they have the (next) chance to backstab. Spotting them is critical to diffusing their effect. Unfortunately, you will probably identify one only when a manager or someone trusted approaches you to validate one of the R.B.’s statements. However, if the R.B. has simply declared that you are an idiot, you won’t likely be provided with the opportunity to address the statement – and spot the back stabber R.B. As a manager, if someone (the prospective back stabber R.B.) tells you a colleague is an idiot, you can respond in one of two ways IF the accused “idiot” is on your team or under your management level First, ask “Does he know he is an idiot?”, and second, declare “If not, let’s get him in here and let him know – or at least let him know you think that. Let’s get this on the table.” Sure, there are real idiots out there. But it is better to deal with these things head on as a manager. This technique keeps you in the management role and “outs” the back stabbing R.B.
If the accused “idiot” is a superior. DO NOT ENGAGE. The Back stabber R.B. will take any conversation (even one-sided) about a superior and put your name on the statements that occur in the conversation.
Once the back stabber R.B. is identified you can call him out in a number of ways. If you hear anything suspect, you can make statements like “I can’t believe anyone would say that….” or “WHO did you hear that from?” or “Gosh, it sounds like you’ve been listening to “Back stabber R.B.” Make sure you circle back to Back stabber R.B. to make him aware of your comment. Back stabbers are a form of bully, just much less direct. And bullies and back stabbers don’t like folks who strike back or have their number.
Roundup
The presence of political behavior demonstrates the absence of management. If you are now or ever will be in a position to extinquish it within a group, there are few things as beneficial that you can do for your team’s well being. Until the day when you are in a position to vanquish this behavior, there’s no rationale, valor or redemption in accepting these behaviors or failing to handle these rat bastards.
Originally published on Business Insider's Strategy Section on 10/14/10.
Posted at 09:56 AM in Start up CEO, Start ups | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Image by Getty Images via @daylife
These skills are rare because few people have them. And these rare skills will drive your career progression upward because they are very valuable. You may already have some of these skills, and what you don’t have, you can develop.
The skills described here aren’t a function of age, education or experience. They all reflect a need for judgment, self control and insight. But with those attributes and these skills, you have all the makings of a top executive.
1. Superior Issue Discernment and Listening Skills
For senior management, identifying critical underlying issues and framing them well for others is a requisite skill. You need to cut through the spin, personal agendas and noise. To do this, you need to hear people out and listen carefully. Ask the right questions, because you need to understand what is important to them, what motivates them and what is driving them .
People will try and spin you or convince you of a specific point of view. Beyond recognizing that truth, you need to understand why they want to spin you and what is in it for them if they succeed in getting you to view the issue from their perspective. Senior management determines the underlying issue as well as the motivation of the person discussing the issue. You should always ask yourself where they are “really” coming from. Try to see through what they’re saying from a personal point of view to the broader organizational issues.
Colleagues will complain about co-workers and customers when they are really talking about the roles the people are playing. Flaws in process and communication are usually surfaced as complaints about individuals fulfilling their described duties. Don’t fall for “Sam is a knucklehead” as the complete issue (which while likely true, it isn’t the issue at hand). The issue at hand may actually be Sam’s position is in procedural or organizational conflict with the complainer’s position.
If you’re leading the change, don’t expect people to jump on the bandwagon until it is clear that the bandwagon is rolling. They will jump on when it looks like you may have a winner. That’s ok. Just get them ready to join you once some momentum is clearly evident. Don’t expect colleagues to think of the changes required, or even help you lead it, but they can help you refine it. And they can help swing public support for the change you’re leading at a critical moment.
When it bubbles up to top management, the first questions will be “What is the change and who is bought in?” followed quickly by “Who is leading this?”
Image via Wikipedia
It is fairly possible to get ordinary people to exceed their historical performance and perform impressively, while not easy to do on the face of it. The key isn’t getting folks to work harder, though this is helpful, the key is getting them to work smarter. For example, if you can get a group to go from making average decisions to superior ones you get a step change in overall performance. If you combine better decisions with incremental effort, you will see extraordinary results. To get colleagues to work smarter, you must create a culture within your group that instructs and enlightens individuals to consistently make better decisions. The essence of superior results is cumulative effort of better decisions and improved execution.
Peter Schultz, the CEO of Porsche, who turned around the company in the early 80’s wrote a book about this very subject. He felt that extraordinary people are by definition rare. And to get ordinary folks to produce extraordinary results one had to establish a leadership culture caused buy in to the bigger mission and better decisions. He also famous for saying that one should “plan democratically and implement like a dictator”.
5. Lead by doing and demonstrate maturity
Demonstrate maturity and accept that you won’t ever receive the full credit.
There is a saying that “ success has many fathers while failure is an orphan.” And if you’re the originator of many successes, you will know the truth of this maxim better than anyone. The majority of people within an organization will never understand the role you’ve played or the contributions you’ve made. If you do a good job of communicating your priorities to upper management, however, they’ll consistently attribute the successes that follow correctly to you.
In the short run, it can be a little disconcerting to hear people re-purposing your insights and leadership. In the long run, no one really believes them because they don’t do anything consistently other than re-purpose other peoples’ contributions.
If you want to be entrusted with tremendous responsibility, your maturity is synonymous with your readiness for it. And as a former chief executive, I can tell you it is very impressive to see someone respond with grace and professionalism when others appropriate their accomplishments.
This article was Originally published in BusinessInsider .
Posted at 11:09 AM in Start up CEO | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
The complexity of an accompanying “Employee Stock Plan” and the
formality of a stock option offer can be off-putting. But, you don’t
have to know a lot to be effective in stock option negotiation. If
you have command of how much options are worth, what is fair in terms of
option amount, the nature of key terms, potential tax liability, and
the power of now, you will be positioned to make the best deal you can.
Image via Wikipedia
To be explicit, having 3,000 stock option shares in a company with
30,000 total shares is having 10%. So, if you are offered 200 stock
options in a company with 30 million shares, it’s nice but it may not be
all that profitable. Here again, the value of the shares is the
ultimate determinant of value but you can't discern too much of anything
based upon the raw number of options (the numerator alone).
Know what is fair
Most
companies establish acceptable stock option grant ranges for certain
positions and associated salaries. What is the range for your position
and where are you in that range? What would it take to get above the
range? If the answer is you can’t be offered an amount of options
outside the pre-determined range, push back on the salary as a
negotiating technique. Either way, seek whatever is fair and
appropriate to the position.
If you’re considering an executive position at a company with existing initial investors, be aware the company will also need to support a CEO, three VP's and five to seven directors with incentive stock options from the stock option pool. While circumstances vary widely to affect the proper amount of options associated with an executive position, the general consensus for various positions is the following:
CEO - Option Grant of 4 to 8%
VP's - Options of 2 to 3%
CFO - Options of 1to 3%
Directors - Options of 1/2% or less
Founder CEOs with shares or other particular facts may influence
these numbers and all generalizations are dangerous. The right amount
for any situation is, and should be, the focus of a fair amount of
discussion.
Comprehend the key terms
The key terms with stock options relate to the price and vesting of the options. What the price is can be relatively straightforward while how the price is determined is not. More on that in a moment.
Vesting means that you earn the right to buy the options over a period of time. Your right vests over time. For example, if the stock option specifies you get 1,000 stock options priced at $1.00 with a vesting period of four years, you can buy 250 shares annually for four years. You don’t have to buy them then, but you have the right to buy them then. If you stay in the employ of the granting company, you may have the right to buy the vested options over 5, 7 or 10 years. You should know the vesting schedule and how long you can buy your vested options.
The price of a stock option is another matter. Stock options are designed and intended by most companies to be valueless on the day they are granted so they don’t create a taxable event in the eyes of the Internal Revenue Service. If you were granted 1,000 shares priced at $2.00, for example, when the fair market value was really $5.00 per share – the I.R.S. views the difference of $3,000 as taxable income.
So the fair market value of the option on the date of the grant is important. (Which is why most stock option scandals relate to “back dating” the options to hide the income effect of granting options priced lower than fair market value). But how does one determine the fair market value of a private company stock option that by definition isn’t sold in any open or efficient stock market?
It can be tough to do well and some specialty financial firms exist almost solely to provide that answer for a fee. In any case, your questions need to be oriented to the timing and source of the valuation. Remember if the options are priced incorrectly, you will personally owe the taxes. The I.R.S. reserves the right of 20/20 hindsight on this pricing event. The company will also be liable for incorrect pricing. What you need to determine is that a professional effort was made to correctly price the options. For a public company employee receiving options, this is much simpler because the pricing is determined by the closing price of the stock on the date of the option grant.
Image via Wikipedia
There are many tales of woe around people buying stock at $1 when it
is worth $5 and waiting to sell the shares, only to sell at $3 per
share. In this example, the taxes are determined from the paper profit
regardless of the actual profit. Does this mean that you should sell the
option on the day you exercise it? For most people, the short answer
is yes. In any case, one should understand the taxable event and
liability. And be ready to pay.
Be aware of the moment
If
your options become more valuable over time, tomorrow’s options will
become scarcer and harder for you to get more of as a result. So the
moment to get stock options is always now. Tomorrow’s options should be,
if things are going well, higher priced. There will be fewer to give
away because the original amount of shares set aside for option grants
tends to diminish over time.
Yes, the company could just simply issue or create more shares for option grants but you need to realize that doing so decreases the value of all existing shares. And remember that the people that need to support the additional share creation are the shareholders who will in fact be hurt by the decrease in share value. The short answer is that everyone acts in their economic self interes,t and as options become more valuable, they become harder for employees to get.
Stock options have been a material wealth source for the employees of many companies. For most people, they are an arcane subject if not an apparently complex one. But given the money at stake, having a working understanding of the issues and dynamics is well worth the time.
This post was originally published by BusinessInsider.com on 9/22/10. Everything you need to know about stock options
Posted at 10:40 AM in Stock Options | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
LivingSocial comes in at #25 in this article.
Image via CrunchBase
Congrats to Tim O'Shaughnessy and the team as well as the Silicon Alley Insider for putting this together.
Posted at 11:49 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |