Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
« Nominations Open for 2010 NVTC "Hot Ticket" Awards | Main | 6 Deals to Avoid in Small Company Business Development »
The comments to this entry are closed.
Leonard Mlodinow: The Drunkard's Walk: How Randomness Rules Our Lives
Robert I. Sutton: The No Asshole Rule: Building a Civilized Workplace and Surviving One That Isn't
Ted Leonsis: The Business of Happiness: 6 Secrets to Extraordinary Success in Life and Work
It's an interesting idea: company vs product vs feature. Forever, the debate has been only about products & features and never included companies. Now, that I come to think about it, Google started as a product that grew into a conglomerate company.
However, do we really need to draw the line between a conglomerate and a hyper-focused company? I do not see any benefits to the entrepreneurial infrastructure in such a distinction, but I do believe that a product-company has a development ceiling.
Posted by: Denis Baranov | April 13, 2010 at 08:09 PM